The question:
Good on you, Vyenkata Bhatta dasa and everyone who took part in the AIDS walk!
Looking at the photo above though, I can't see any devotees sporting sikha or wearing dhoti. Is it common now in ISKCON for members not to dress like ISKCON used to? I know it's a little shallow, and clothes do not maketh the man (or monk), but that's how I recognise the devotees of Krsna. Also didn't Prabhupada himself recommened dhoti, tilak and sikha for all devotees?
My response:
Thanks for your questions, Anonymous prabhu. As you will see from the photo essay in the next post, we had quite a diverse turn-out for the Walk - including our favorite monk, Gadadhara Pandit prabhu (aka NYC Pandit)in full-on saffron dhoti, shaved head and sikha.
In addition, some devotees do keep a sikha (like me) and some did have on tilak (like Yadunath prabhu). However other devotees choose to dress in Western clothes and keep conventional hairstyles.
I think one of the nicest things about representing Krishna consciousness at events like this is that we can help people to understand that devotees of Krishna are -- externally speaking -- not so different than they are. This can help others relate to us and approach the devotees.
I don't think that it is "common for members not to dress like ISKCON used to" per se, but I do feel that devotees tend to present themselves in a way that reflects who they are. In the 1960s and 1970s, most ISKCON devotees were monks and "nuns" -- brahmacaris, brahmacarinis, sannyasis, and "brahmacari-grihastas" who lived as monks did, cloistered from the mainstream society. Today, most ISKCON devotees live, work, and participate in the greater community around them. I think it is natural (and desirable) that some devotees should thus choose to dress and look like the general populace.I am not aware of any instructions Srila Prabhupada gave insisting upon dhoti, tilak, and sikha for all members. I do remember reading that Prabhupada allowed his grhasta male devotees who were working outside the movement to keep short, contemporary hairstyles ("like a respectable gentleman") instead of a shaved head -- but no dressing like a hippie!
Hridayananda Goswami recently made an interesting point on this subject. He said that in Lord Caitanya's time, when devotees went out on harinama, they were dressed *the same way that everyone else was!* In other words, by wearing dhotis and chaddars, etc. they weren't weren't trying to stand out by their clothing -- they were perfectly fitting in. An interesting argument to try going out on harinama in contemporary clothes (or at least have devotees mix it up)...
Ultimately, I think you said it best: "The clothes do not maketh the man." For some devotees (especially the monks) dressing in traditional Indian garb may help them represent the tradition; for others, they may choose to represent Krishna by wearing Western clothes.
Personally, I'd like to see Hare Krishna devotees recognized -- regardless of what they are wearing -- by their exemplary behavior, compassion and humility, and genuine expressions of joy on their faces.
Hare Krishna!
3 comments:
You should take a look at this site, by HH Danavir Swami on Devotee dress.
http://www.iskcon-network.com/blog/_archives/2006/11/7/2481856.html
To Vineet Chander, I just recent;y read your article in a 1996 edition of back to godhead and I was very impressed. I think we should all wear tilak as it is like a war paint and gives us energy.
Updated link for HH Danavir Goswami's article on vaisnava dress http://www.prabhupada.org/rama/?p=3274
Post a Comment